Blogs

Is Violating Rule 21F-17(a) Still an Enforcement Priority?

By George Wilson posted an hour ago

  

Over the years the SEC’s Enforcement Division has brought a number of cases against companies, including J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, CBRE, Inc. and The Brink’s Company, for violating Rule 21F-17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This section of the Act prohibits companies from taking any action to limit communicating directly with the SEC concerning a possible securities law violation.

 

In a sign that this kind of violation will continue to be a focus area for the Enforcement Division, this May 22, 2026, Administrative Proceeding Summary announced settled charges against Foot Locker, Inc. for using separation agreements that violated Rule 21F-17(a). The company entered into a cease and desist order and paid a $148,000 civil penalty.

 

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

Subscribe to the SEC Institute blog for updates

Visit https://seciblog.pli.edu/ to find more articles, resources, and events.

This content has been provided by The SEC Institute, a Community Sponsor of Pro Groups. The SEC Institute is part of the Practising Law Institute (PLI), a nonprofit learning organization dedicated to keeping attorneys and other professionals at the forefront of knowledge and expertise.


#CommunitySponsor
#SECPro
#FinancialReporting
#SECEnforcement
#SECReporting
#NA
0 comments
4 views

Permalink